Weather

My Archives

Calendar

August 2020
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

ClustrMaps

Login

Любимый город может спать спокойно…

Вот этот ужас сейчас в Портланде ежедневно. Уже больше 70-ти дней.

Никто арестован не был

Children Lives Matters. Or not?

К сожалению, это все становится нашей реальностью. Нашей Американской реальностью.

Мальчик 5-ти лет, был застрелен выстрелом в голову. Очень “добрый” человек, чья жизнь очень важна, подошел к мальчику, катающемуся на велосипеде. Подошел, и выстрелил в голову. 

Случилось это в Северной Каролине.

И, еще, — тот, кто застрелил мальчика, был соседом этой семьи. 

North Carolina man shot and killed 5-year old neighbor while playing in his yard, police say

Shot in head

TUCSON, Ariz. (KOLD News 13) – A man in North Carolina shot and killed his five-year-old neighbor in front of the boy’s family, police say.

Police in Wilson, NC. said Darius Sessoms, 25, shot and killed Cannon Hinnant while the boy was playing in his yard with his family Sunday evening.

Cannon’s mother said her son was playing outside when Sessoms ran up to the boy, shot him in the head, then fled.

Doris Lybrand, a neighbor who witnessed the shooting, told local news sources in the area that Sessoms ran up to Cannon, put a gun to his head and fired before running back to his own house.

Lybrand said she first thought Sessoms was playing with the kids, but when she saw Cannon’s father’s reaction, she ran inside her home and called 911.

Cannon’s mother said the boy’s sisters, ages seven and eight, were playing with him when the shooting happened and witnessed their little brother get shot.

Cannon was taken to a nearby hospital where he died.

No details about a possible motive for the shooting have been released, but Wilson authorities believe the shooting wasn’t random. Sessoms lives next door to Cannon’s father. A neighbor said that the two men had dinner together Saturday night and that Sessoms was at Cannon’s father’s home earlier Sunday, the day of the shooting.

Sessoms was caught Monday night, about 24 hours after the shooting in the nearby town of Goldsboro. He was charged with first-degree murder and is being held without bond in the Wilson County Jail.

A GoFundMe page has been set up to raise money for Cannon’s funeral expenses.

Copyright 2020 KOLD News 13. All rights reserved.

Я живу в самом “законном” городе.

Как я понимаю, власти Портланда пытаются быть на самом переднем крае всех новаций закона, особенно если это касается всего того, что происходит после смерти “Святого Джорджа Флойда”.

Думаете, я просто так это пишу? Безосновательно?

Нашел в Сети вот такой любопытный документ, выпущенный Прокурором нашего графства. Это руководство к действию для всех правоохранителей графства.

POLICY REGARDING PROTEST RELATED CASES
Members of our community have taken to the streets every night since the murder of George Floyd to express their collective grief, anger, and frustration over not just that senseless act of violence, but the countless other abuses People of Color have endured in our country throughout history. The demands for change go beyond calling for an end to police violence and encompass the need for all of us to acknowledge and address centuries of racism and oppression that are manifested in mass incarceration, economic inequality, educational disadvantages, and disparities in health care that have allowed COVID-19 to ravage our communities of color.
As prosecutors, we acknowledge the depth of emotion that motivates these demonstrations and support those who are civically engaged through peaceful protesting. We recognize that we will undermine public safety, not promote it, if we leverage the force of our criminal justice system against peaceful protestors who are demanding to be heard. The Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office will always strive to advance the safety of our community and its members. We recognize the need to broaden our vision of what a safe community means and our role in promoting that vision. To advance public safety we must not only prevent crime, but must also promote economic and housing stability, educational opportunities, strong family and community relationships, and the mental and physical health of all those who live in our county.
Seen through that lens, the prosecution of cases relating solely to protest activities, most of which have a weak nexus to further criminality and which are unlikely to be deterred by prosecution, draws away from crucially needed resources. As stewards of public resources, we must devote our efforts to prosecuting crimes that allow us to protect our most vulnerable victims to have the greatest impact on promoting a safer community for everyone in Multnomah County.
For these reasons, our Office will apply the following presumptions to all referred cases arising from the current protests in our community. A prosecutor choosing to decline to prosecute a case is not condoning or endorsing the conduct that led to the arrest and/or citation. A decision to not prosecute a case is not a comment on whether or not the arrest was lawful. As with all presumptions, where an individual case presents unusual, aggravating circumstances, line prosecutors may obtain supervisor approval to proceed with the case.

August 11, 2020 

 

Continue reading “Я живу в самом “законном” городе.” →

А вот что происходит у нас, здесь.

Очень смелые молодые люди. 

Это сколько храбрости нужно иметь, чтобы противостоять вот этой женщине…

Как защитить педофила?!

Я уже несколько раз писал о том, что когда срываются тормоза с чего-либо, после этого остановиться очень сложно.

Вот вам еще один пример. 

В Калифорнии, Демократы пытаются принять закон, где облегчается жизнь самой “загнанной” части нашего общества. А именно, речь идет о педофилах.

Закон позволяет не регистрировать педофила как педофила, если его жертва моложе самого преступника менее чем на 10 лет.

Если коротко, то после совершения преступления и после осуждения в Суде, педофилов в США заносят в определенные списки, после этого списки эти становятся доступны для всех. Просмотрев эти списки, все интересующиеся могут узнать, не живет ли человек, осужденный за педофилию рядом с вами. Нет ли опасности для детей, живущих рядом с преступником.

В общем, как я понимаю, демократы в Калифорнии решили облегчить жизнь осужденным уже педофилам.

CA Democrats Author Bill to Protect Sex Offenders Who Lure Minors

No sex offender registry if perpetrator within 10 years of age of the minor

ByKaty Grimes, February 19, 2019 3:03 pm

 

State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introducedrecent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.”

However, under their bill,SB 145,the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor.

Wiener claims the current law “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.”

Existing law,the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended byProposition 35by voters in 2012 (Ban on Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery), requires a person convicted of a certain sex crime to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California.

Wienersays, “Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.”

“This bill would authorize a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors to seek discretionary relief from the duty to register if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor,”SB 145 states.

Proposition 35 was created and passed to protect children from sexual exploitation and sex trafficking. Victims of sex trafficking are often vulnerable children, “afraid for their lives and abused—sexually, physically, and mentally,” the Propositionsaid.

What Does SB 145 Also Do?

Legislators Wiener and Eggman say they are trying to shield LGBT young people from having to automatically register as sex offenders for specified sex crimes. But their bill does much more.

SB 145 would allow a sex offender who lures a minor with the intent to commit a felony (i.e. a sex act) the ability to escape registering as a sex offender as long as the offender is within 10 years of age of the minor.  No specification is made as to whether the sexual offender is straight or LGBT.

SB 145 would add a section to the state’s penal code (Section 290.55) stipulating that as long as the offender is “not more than 10 years older than the minor,” they are not automatically mandated to register as a sex offender. There is no age limit or range specified, except for existing law which already excludes lewd acts with children under 14.

SB 145 appears to allow adults to victimize minors by luring them with the intent to have sex, and then shields the predator from being automatically registered as a sex offender, as in the case of a 25 year old luring a 15 year old for sex, or a 22 year old luring a 12 year old.

SB 145, as currently written, appears to allow certain sexual predators to live among the population without anyone being aware.

Why is this bill needed?

Here is the text fromSB 145:

 

This bill would authorize a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors to seek discretionary relief from the duty to register if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor.

Digest Key – Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: NO

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Section 290.55 is added to the Penal Code, immediately following Section 290.5, to read:

290.55. (a) A person convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (b) may, by writ of mandate, seek discretionary relief from the duty, imposed as a result of that conviction, to register pursuant to the act if, at the time of the offense, the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor, as measured from the minor’s date of birth to the person’s date of birth.

Here is thecurrent California Penal Code § 288.3(2017)

(a) Every person who contacts or communicates with a minor, or attempts to contact or communicate with a minor, who knows or reasonably should know that the person is a minor, with intent to commit an offense specified in Section 207, 209, 261, 264.1, 273a, 286, 287, 288, 288.2, 289, 311.1, 311.2, 311.4 or 311.11, or former Section 288a, involving the minor shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for the term prescribed for an attempt to commit the intended offense.

(b) As used in this section, “contacts or communicates with” shall include direct and indirect contact or communication that may be achieved personally or by use of an agent or agency, any print medium, any postal service, a common carrier or communication common carrier, any electronic communications system, or any telecommunications, wire, computer, or radio communications device or system.

(c) A person convicted of a violation of subdivision (a) who has previously been convicted of a violation of subdivision (a) shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for five years.

Last week,California Globe reportedon another sex crime bill introduced by California Democrats: “legislation to shield a person from the consequences of crimes they commit in California, even violent ones, as long as the person reports the crimes to authorities.The language of the proposed statute appears to immunize a person from ANY crime so long as they are reporting a violation of a sex crime law.”  Sen. Scott Wiener is the author of California Senate Bill 233.

Полностью, — здесь.